Rombach v. Piedmont & Arlington Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Third District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Monroe, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Manning, J.
The plaintiff insured the life of his mother-in-law in the defendant Company in February, 1873, for two thousand dollars, the policy reciting that it is issued “ for the sole use of her son-in-law, L. Rombacli.” His wife, the daughter of Eliza Geisler, had died leaving two children of tender years. Mrs. Geisler had insured her own life a month before in this Company for the benefit of two of her own children, for the same sum as this policy.
The agent of the Company sought Rombacli, and told him of the policy Mrs. Geisler had taken, and asked…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Lord v. DallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Lewis v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
3Cited by11 opinions
- Acme Manufacturing Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Field v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecurityNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Burton v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Goodwin v. Federal Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Mutual Savings Life Insurance Company v. NoahSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.