Legal Opinion

Moore v. Clarke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1930No. 22363. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Moore, seeks recovery of the amount of installments paid by her to the defendant Clarke, as selling agent for the defendant Seattle Title Trust Company, a corporation, upon her contract with that company for the sale to her of lot 11, in block 1, of The Uplands, an addition to the city of Seattle. The cause proceeded to trial in the superior court, sitting without a jury, as one of equitable cognizance. Mrs. Moore’s claim for relief is rested upon: (1) Alleged failure of title and inability of the trust company to cause to be conveyed to her good title to the lot, free…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bozdech v. Montana Ranches Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rubenstein v. HershornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Wingard v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Miller v. Calvin Philips & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Snowden v. DerrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hebb v. SeversonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. McPhaden v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Miller v. Schwinn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Saterlie v. LineberryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API