Legal Opinion

Werlinger v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1990No. 17937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus case. Michael Werlinger, a prison inmate, seeks our review of a district court decision upholding a magistrate’s order that dismissed Werlinger’s petition and awarded attorney fees to the state. The issues are (1) whether a constitutionally protected liberty interest is created by a prison’s administrative procedure for reviewing inmate grievances, and (2) whether an award of attorney fees is appropriate in this case. As more fully explained below, we affirm the district court’s decision in part and reverse it in part.

The pertinent facts may be stated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Gilbert v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Vannatter v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API