Legal Opinion

Tak Communications v. Gerasimchik

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1991No. 91-00341PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is before us on appeal from an order awarding compensation benefits. We affirm without discussion the award of benefits. We grant appellee’s motion for attorney fees and remand for appropriate findings. However, certain comments of the judge of compensation at the hearing of January 28, 1991, appear to be highly inappropriate. That colloquy is as follows:

THE JUDGE: THIS IS A HEARING BEFORE HONORABLE ARTHUR S. SEPPI, JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS, in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, on Monday, January 28, 1991, commencing at 10:50 a.m. in The Department of Labor and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Alamo Rent-A-Car v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API