Tak Communications v. Gerasimchik
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
This cause is before us on appeal from an order awarding compensation benefits. We affirm without discussion the award of benefits. We grant appellee’s motion for attorney fees and remand for appropriate findings. However, certain comments of the judge of compensation at the hearing of January 28, 1991, appear to be highly inappropriate. That colloquy is as follows:
THE JUDGE: THIS IS A HEARING BEFORE HONORABLE ARTHUR S. SEPPI, JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS, in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, on Monday, January 28, 1991, commencing at 10:50 a.m. in The Department of Labor and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Alamo Rent-A-Car v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992