Legal Opinion

Honea v. Matson Navigation Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 20, 1972No. C-70-23 (OJC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge

(Under Designation).

In this proceeding under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, Ronald Honea, employed as a room steward aboard the cruise ship, SS LURLINE, seeks damages for injuries received aboard the vessel on August 6, 1969, at approximately 11:00 a. m., while engaged in the performance of his duties when the cruise ship was docked at Honolulu, Hawaii, preparing for its return trip to San Francisco.

With candor, the defendant admitted at the trial and on brief that an unseaworthy condition existed. The sole questions presented to the court are (1)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robert Bernard Smith, and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Whitehall Terminal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Stefanos Ktistakis v. United Cross Navigation Corp., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. Capitol Foundry Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. George E. Schell v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Albert B. Sines, an Incompetent, by John Victor Tilly, Guardian of His Estate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Diaz v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API