Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Handel
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 9, 1985No. Civ. 85-1770PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BROTMAN, District Judge.
This is an action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by which plaintiffs seek relief from persons acting under color or authority of state law, who allegedly deprive them of their constitutional rights. Plaintiffs are thoroughbred race horse jockeys who complain that the New Jersey Racing Commission’s regulations authorizing breathalyzer and urine tests for alcohol and drug use violate several of their constitutionally protected freedoms. They seek a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction against their…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- John P. Mack v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Shoemaker v. HandelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Lawrence Michael DuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lovvorn v. City of Chattanooga, Tenn.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- United States v. Freddie B. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.