Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. Dolby
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD R. BECKER, * Circuit Judge.
These interpleader actions were brought by plaintiffs Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335 (1976), to determine the proper beneficiary of two policies insuring the life, of decedent Jon Stephen Dolby. Defendants A. Jay Dolby and Provident National Bank are the co-guardians of the estate of claimant Andrew John Dolby, a minor and the decedent’s nephew. Defendant and claimant Catherine Rohas Dolby is the decedent’s widow, from whom he was separated at the time…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fidelity Bank v. Commonwealth Marine & General Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. EconomouDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Gallery House, Inc. v. YiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Van Gelder v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Bolton v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.