Rosenblatt v. City Rent & Rehabilitation Administration
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.
Petitioner seeks review and revocation of the final order of the respondent City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator. The final order is stated in the petition to be that of August 14, 1962. By cross motion, respondent moves to dismiss the petition, as a matter of law, upon the ground that this proceeding was not instituted within the time limitation period of 30 days after the issuance of the final order sought to be reviewed. The final order is specified by respondent as that issued by it on July 19, 1962. If this be the proper order, then the respondent’s motion must be granted.
A study…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Magid v. GabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966