Legal Opinion

Instrument Systems Corp. v. Whitman, Ransom & Coulson

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.

Plaintiffs move to dismiss defendants’ affirmative defense that this action for attorneys’ malpractice is barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations. The question is when the cause of action accrued.

The alleged negligence of defendants, and particularly defendant Robinson, consisted in preparing, recommending and approving a stock option plan for plaintiff corporation that would be entitled to preferential tax treatment as a “ qualified stock option ’ ’. Plaintiffs allege that the plan failed to qualify under the applicable tax statutes. Defendants’ advice was originally given by letter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. EconomNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Troll v. GlantzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968
  3. Marine Midland Trust Co. of the Mohawk Valley v. Penberthy, De Iorio & RayhillNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gurkewitz v. HabermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API