Legal Opinion
Kohn v. Teleprompter Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 14, 1958PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
These are motions by plaintiff and third-party defendants to vacate an ex parte order, granting leave to defendants Autocue Company, Inc., and Lawrence H. Merchant, hereinafter third-party plaintiffs, to serve a third-party complaint pursuant to Rule 14(a), and to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Analysis of the pleadings is necessary to consideration of the motion to vacate.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges a conspiracy in restraint of trade and an attempt to monopolize the cueing and prompting business under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. ScottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Higgins v. Shenango Pottery Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Huggins v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Green v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Allen & Whalen, Inc. v. John C. Grimberg Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.