Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided April 23, 1986No. 85-239Published

1Concurrence

*862SACKETT, Judge

specially concurring.

The general rule in Iowa is one of liberality in the admission of opinion evidence. See State v. Halstead, 862 N.W.2d 504, 506 (Iowa 1985); State v. Hummell, 228 N.W.2d 77, 82 (Iowa 1975). I cannot agree with the majority’s blanket assertion that Bartolla’s training was not sufficient to allow him to testify had defendant not been diabetic the incident probably would not have happened.

However, I agree with, the majority because I find, as did the majority, that defendant has failed to meet the difficult standard of making a clear showing the trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. State v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. State v. HummellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. Wamstad v. LoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API