Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Raftery Ex Rel. Huie Fong v. Bligh

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 19, 1932No. 2580Published

1ConcurrenceWilson, Circuit Judge

I am unable to concur except in the result of the opinion of the majority, as it seems to me to misinterpret section 5278 of the Revised Statutes (18 USCA § 662) governing extradition, which the opinion construes in the light of the Fourth Amendment of the Federal. Constitution. The Fourth Amendment has nothing to do with the forms of complaints, or the grounds on which a warrant for arrest may be issued in the several states.

The opinion states that “it is well settled that the affidavit called for by section 5278 when so construed, is an affidavit stating facts of the affiant’s own…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Matter of StraussSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Innes v. TobinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API