Legal Opinion

Reese v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 2003No. A03A0896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Donald Reese claims the trial court erred by granting summary judgment against his suit bringing false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution claims against the City of Atlanta and its police officer employee, E. B. Lane, and claims against the City for negligent hiring and retention of Officer Lane. Because we find the City was entitled to governmental immunity and Officer Lane was entitled to official immunity, we affirm the grant of summary judgment.

While Officer Lane was investigating a report that Reese had been scalping tickets outside the Georgia…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Cameron v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Reese v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. City of Atlanta v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scott v. City of ValdostaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Watkins v. LatifCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Brown v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  4. Franklin v. BryanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  5. Joiner v. GlennSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API