Legal Opinion

People v. Houle

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

153 Cal.App.2d Supp. 894 (1957)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

DAVID J. HOULE et al., Appellants.

California Court of Appeals.

Aug. 5, 1957.

A. A. George for Appellants.

Robert M. Wash, County Counsel (Fresno), for Respondent.

DeWOLF, J.

Because the facts and law involved in each of the two above named appeals, Numbers 49 and 50, are identical, it is ordered that they be consolidated for the purpose of this opinion and judgment.

The undisputed facts are as follows:

The defendant was arrested on two separate complaints charging traffic violations. On November 15, 1956, a bail bondsman secured his release by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oppenheimer v. Sunkist GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. People v. RolleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. DurbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. DurbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API