City of Reno v. Forrest
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
These three appeals by the City of Reno are presented as a result of the district court’s granting the three respondents-defendants’ pretrial habeas applications and ordering them released from custody.
Respondent-defendant Arbogast was charged with pimping, a violation of Reno Municipal Code Section 11.12.070(a) (3).1 Respondents-defendants Forrest and Brase were charged *8with soliciting prostitution, a violation of Reno Municipal Code Section 11.12.330(1).2
The habeas petitions were predicated on four grounds:(1) There did not exist probable cause to believe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1904
- Cook v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Ex Parte PhilipieNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Ex parte KairNevada Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex parte RosenblattNevada Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.