Legal Opinion

City of Reno v. Forrest

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1971No. 6242; No. 6243; No. 6244Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

These three appeals by the City of Reno are presented as a result of the district court’s granting the three respondents-defendants’ pretrial habeas applications and ordering them released from custody.

Respondent-defendant Arbogast was charged with pimping, a violation of Reno Municipal Code Section 11.12.070(a) (3).1 Respondents-defendants Forrest and Brase were charged *8with soliciting prostitution, a violation of Reno Municipal Code Section 11.12.330(1).2

The habeas petitions were predicated on four grounds:(1) There did not exist probable cause to believe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Cook v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ex Parte PhilipieNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ex parte KairNevada Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ex parte RosenblattNevada Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API