Legal Opinion

In re Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Peter J. Collins, as superintendent of the bureau of buildings of the city of New York for the borough of Brooklyn, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 6th day of March, 1905, granting the petitioner’s application for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling him to approve a proposed amendment to a plan for the construction of a building in said borough.

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, P. J.:

In the month of October, 1901, the petitioner submitted plans for the erection of a building in Brooklyn which were duly approved and a permit was issued. The plans provided for a three-story building to be used for bowling-alley purposes, the building to be eighty-five feet.by thirty-three feet in length and breadth, and forty-*12four feet in height. They provided for an interior stairway leading from floor to floor, four feet in width, and for an exterior iron fire escape, three feet in width. In the month of February, 1905, the petitioner applied for permission to amend the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colonial Beacon Oil Co. v. FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Hewlett Developers, Inc. v. FrisinaNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People ex rel. Namm v. CarlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API