Johnson v. Lindsay
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho Distrid Court. The nature of the action, and the facts, sufficiently appear in the opinion. The defendants, Johnson and wife, have brought the case here for a review of an order made at the April Term, 1881, of the district court, confirming a sheriff’s sale.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This is a proceeding to review an order of the court below confirming a sheriff’s sale. The facts are substantially as follows:
On July 14,1880, A. L. Lindsay, one of the defendants in error j (plaintiff below,) commenced an action against plaintiffs in error, (defendants below,) to recover $2,150 as damages sustained on account of certain alleged wrongful acts of the defendants. Service was made by publication in a newspaper. An. affidavit alleged that the defendants were nonresidents of the state was filed, and an order of attachment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dewey v. LinscottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Howard v. EntrekenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- New England Mortgage Security Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Galbreath v. DroughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Linvill v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
- Lombard Investment Co. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
- McFall v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. WarnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937