Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Luis v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 2011No. 3D10-1093Published

1ConcurrenceSalter, J.

(specially concurring).

I concur that we are obligated to affirm the order by the Commission and findings *713of the referee in this case. I write to provide additional facts and analysis, however, for the benefit of the Agency for Workforce Innovation, its adjudicators and appeals referees.

Ms. Luis was a housekeeper at a Holiday Inn Hotel. She maintains that on July 9, 2009, she told her supervisor that she was not feeling well and could only work until midday. She alleges that her supervisor told her that was not a problem, but the next day she was not allowed to clock in to work and was told…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arensen v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Lopez v. A Aaron Super Rooter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API