James v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BURNS, District Judge.
After a somewhat extended trial, the jury in the instant case returned a verdict which reads as follows: “And now, to wit: Feb. 28, 1951, we, the Jurors empaneled in the above-entitled case, find (1) the Pennsylvania Railroad Company guilty of negligence. (2) Silicosis contracted prior to 1946 and aggravated by subsequent employment with the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. (3) Plaintiff awarded thirty three thousand dollars.”
*242The motion before this Court for judgment or a new trial primarily raises tire question whether plaintiff is barred from recovery because of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brisboy v. Fibreboard Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Bradt v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954
- Brisboy v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stanford James v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.