Legal Opinion

Johnson v. De Toledo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 18, 2001No. SC 16475PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Scott Johnson, doing business as Viking Painting, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment granting the application of the defendant homeowners, Victoria de Toledo and Stewart M. Casper, to discharge the mechanic’s hen filed by the plaintiff against their property. Johnson v. de Toledo, 61 Conn. App. 156, 763 A.2d 28 (2000). We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. De ToledoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Johnson v. De ToledoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. New Image Contractors, LLC v. Village at Mariner's Point Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. DeCastro v. Odetah Camping Resort, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. State v. SnowdenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API