State v. Douglas
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Dissent
Hastings, Shanahan, and Grant, JJ., and Moran, D.J.,
dissenting.
For the reasons hereinafter stated we dissent from the acquittal on specification No. 1 — duty not to misrepresent.
Paul L. Douglas, before being elected Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, invested in the commodities market with a friend, Paul E. Gaiter, a Lincoln attorney. That venture into commodities *250was unsuccessful, for Douglas and Gaiter lost $40,000 —a $20,000 loss sustained by each in the market endeavors.
After Douglas’ election as Attorney General, Gaiter told Douglas about a real estate investment, namely, real…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. PerranoskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Marshall Impeachment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Rettinger ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. PierpontNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.