Legal Opinion

McKnight v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1990No. 89-1388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Charles McKnight appeals his conviction for armed robbery. We conclude first that there was no violation of Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). See Bush v. State, 461 So.2d 936, 938 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1031, 106 S.Ct. 1237, 89 L.Ed.2d 345 (1986). Second, we conclude that the firearm was properly admitted into evidence. Bega v. State, 100 So.2d 455, 457-58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958). Finally, the evidence was sufficient to support McKnight’s conviction and the trial court properly denied the motion for judgment of acquittal. See Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175, 1177 (Fla.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Pressley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Bega v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API