United States v. Long
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Frank Long, an American Indian, moves to dismiss a federal indictment on the ground that the prosecution of him by the United States violates the Double Jeopardy Clause because the Menominee Indian Tribe previously prosecuted and convicted him of the same offense. Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Gorence recommended that I deny the motion, and defendant objected to her recommendation. I review the portion of the recommendation to which defendant objected de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673-676, 100 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.