Legal Opinion

United States v. Long

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 23, 2002No. 2:01-cv-00102Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Frank Long, an American Indian, moves to dismiss a federal indictment on the ground that the prosecution of him by the United States violates the Double Jeopardy Clause because the Menominee Indian Tribe previously prosecuted and convicted him of the same offense. Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Gorence recommended that I deny the motion, and defendant objected to her recommendation. I review the portion of the recommendation to which defendant objected de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673-676, 100 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API