Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Milliken

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

MAtion by the plaintiff for a new trial. The plaintiff’s intestate was an employee of the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Without reviewing the evidence in detail, it seems to me conclusive that if the verdict for the defendants was based upon a determination by the jury that the death of plaintiff’s intestate was not the result of the injury received by tiim at the time of the fall of the derrick, the verdict *337should be set aside. No other cause for his death is suggested by the evidence, and the testimony of all the physicians, including that of the expert produced by the defendants, makes it clear that the injury to Gorman’s skull developed months afterward into the meningitis which caused his death. On the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Whittaker v. Delaware & H. Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucid v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  2. Byers v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  3. Gorman v. MillikenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API