Friedman's Express, Inc. v. Mirror Transp. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
Application has been made to this Court for a temporary injunction, restraining the defendant company from transporting certain commodities known as “Comic Supplements”. Nothing would be involved upon a final hearing that may not now be determined, and the whole matter may be disposed of by a finding as to the simple question at issue in the present application.
Reduced to its simplest form, the court is called upon to determine whether or not the commodity being transported, is at the time of such transportation, a newspaper within the meaning of Congress in 49 U.S.C.A.…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Daily Record Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- K Mart Corp. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Gulf Coast Media v. Mobile PressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. J. C. Penney Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.