Legal Opinion
Capital Investors Co. v. Devers
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1967No. Nos. 11200, 11345PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
These are consolidated appeals involving the same parties whose rights and obligations with respect to certain real estate we considered in a prior appeal. For a narrative of the facts and the relation of the parties see Capital Investors Co. v. Devers and companion eases, 360 F.2d 462 (4th Cir. 1966). In our prior decision we held parol evidence competent to prove that Capital Investors Company’s notes were interest bearing. On remand the district court heard oral testimony to that effect and found that Capital “promised to pay interest at 6% per annum * * The finding is not clearly…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Varley v. VarleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Capital Investors Co. v. Arthur R. Morrison, James T. Benn v. Arthur R. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Capital Investors Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Capital Investors Company, Marian A. Morrison, and Arthur R. Morrison v. Malcolm B. Devers, Capital Investors Co. v. Arthur R. Morrison, A/K/A A. R. Morrison, and Malcolm B. Devers, and Charles M. Fairchild, and Vincent G. Iorio and Emogene B. Iorio, and Marian A. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967