Legal Opinion

City of Youngstown v. Dixon, 07 Ma 105 (3-3-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2009No. 07 MA 105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, and the parties' briefs. Defendant-Appellant Roderick Dixon appeals the decision of the Youngstown Municipal Court, which found him guilty of domestic violence, in violation of R.C. 2919.25(A). He was found not guilty of child endangerment and cruelty to animals.

{¶ 2} On appeal, Dixon argues that his conviction was based on insufficient evidence and was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Because we conclude that the verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MauldinOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API