Legal Opinion
People v. Watson
California Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1913No. Crim. No. 1716PublishedCited by 7 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuba County and from an order refusing a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
A rehearing was granted after decision of this case by the district court of appeal. We quote from the opinion of that court the statement of facts:
“Bury and his wife were married at Sebastopol in Sonoma County on the sixteenth day of August, 1910. She remained there until the latter part of the month when she returned to the home of her parents in Marysville. After the expiration of a month she returned to her husband but remained only till the middle of November. She then came back to Marysville and went to work as a waitress at the Western Hotel where she was -engaged until the tragedy on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. GedziumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- People v. CuccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. MoragaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. ZabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.