Legal Opinion

Sellers v. United States Lines Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 8, 1949No. 24543-S-LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, District Judge.

The libelant knew when he left the ship on August 2d that the loading was about completed. He had just come off two watches which ran from 4 p. m. on August 1st to 8 a. m. on August 2d. It was his dutjT while on these watches to take the temperatures. In doing this he was required to go down in the hold and he must have observed that the loading operations were about completed on the morning of the 2d, as the ship’s log definitely shows. He states that he had permission from cither the Chief Engineer or Assistant Engineer to leave the boat and not return until his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. Fink v. Shepard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Ellis v. American Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ladzinski v. Sperling Steamship and Trading Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Emmett E. Neathery v. M/v Overseas Marilyn and Maritime Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API