Legal Opinion

Morris v. Canfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Applying to this filiation proceeding the requirement that the evidence of paternity must be more than preponderant and must, indeed, convince “to the point of entire satisfaction” (Commissioner of Welfare v. Rose, 283 App. Div. 781; Erie County Bd. of Social Welfare v. Holiday, 14 A D 2d 832), we find the evidence less than satisfactory, both upon consideration of the entire record, which consists almost entirely of complainant’s uncorroborated and occasionally suspicious testimony, and upon separate evaluation of the medical evidence, from which it appears improbable that the full-term baby…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commissioner of Welfare ex rel. Treadwell v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maureen E. O'H. v. Nicholas C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Denise UU. v. Frank VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API