Legal Opinion

People v. Glass

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1972No. Docket 11689PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The defendant, Paul Glass, and his brother, Joe Glass, were charged with armed robbery. MCLA 750.529; MSA 28.797. After a six-day trial, which began on July 17, 1969, the jury was unable to agree on a verdict and a new trial was ordered.

Between the first and second trials, on August 1, 1969, the Glasses, who were indigent and represented by assigned counsel, filed a motion to obtain at state expense a transcript of the testimony of the first trial. The lawyers for the Glasses referred the trial judge to judicial precedents which they claimed supported their motion, but did not file a written…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Roberts v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. The People v. DelafosseIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. StovallDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  2. People v. HughesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. JACQUELINE BROWNMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. KelleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. HamptonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API