Harding v. Lewis

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WITTIG.

Appellee, George C. Lewis, claims an equitable exception to dormant judgment rules under the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Appellant, Ray Harding, contends that two trial court findings are factually insufficient. The court found that Harding’s fraudulent conduct sought to evade execution of the judgment against him. Additionally, it found that Lewis used reasonable diligence in attempting to locate assets. We affirm.

I

Lewis secured a judgment in 1989 against Harding. The judgment was abstracted November 15, 1989. In December of that year, a writ was…