Legal Opinion

Gobie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 21, 1966No. 65-837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged in two informations with robbery and in a third with breaking and entering. He was tried and convicted on two informations and pleaded guilty on one. The sentences imposed run concurrently. His motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, was denied by the trial court, and this appeal followed. A continuance granted prior to trial, on motion of the state, was a matter within the sound judicial discretion of the trial court. Abuse of discretion was not shown. Appellant’s challenge of a ruling of the trial court on admissibility of certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Sam v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Kirkland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Abbott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paulk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Gobie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Barnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Paramore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API