Legal Opinion

C-A

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1961No. 1175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AiAfftlt OF In EXCLUSION Proceedings A-6284229 Decided by Board Oetobor 17, .1961 'Expatriation—Dual national—Section 350, 1952 act—Accepting benefit of for- eign nationality. Where dual national had no knowledge that he had a claim to United Staten citizenship at the time he accepted the benefits of foreign nationality, his action was not "voluntary" and did not result in expatriation under sec- tion 350 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Overrules contrary hold- ings in Matter of F—G—, 4--528, and Matter of if — , 3-558.) EXCLUDABLE : Act of 1952—Sections 212(a) (20) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perri v. DullesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  2. Joseph A. Jalbuena v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Cantoni v. AchesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
  4. William P. Rogers, as Attorney General of the United States of America v. Urho Paavo PatokoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Schaufus v. Attorney General of United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GRAHAMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1964
  2. RAMOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API