Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1860PublishedCited by 1 opinion

PROM DEKALB. There was decree in this cause for the complainants, at the-:— Term, 1860. Chancellor Broomfield L. Ridley, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinney, J.

This is rather a novel case, in all its features. The original bill was filed in the names of the complainant, Mary T. Johnson (as wife of the defendant, John Johnson.) and her three children, the issue of a former marriage. It is in the nature of a bill quia timet, to restrain the defendant from removing or disposing of certain slaves, named therein; and also to have the construction and legal effect of a written instrument, executed by said Mary T., before her marriage with the defendant, purporting to dispose of said slaves, declared by the Court.

The bill alleges that the complainant, Mary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coe v. GivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bass v. BassCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API