Legal Opinion

Tapp v. Stuart

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1934No. 897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

Many of the facts material to the decision of this ease on the merits are stated in Tapp v. Stuart (D. C.) 6 F. Supp. 577.

For more than twenty years prior to the commencement of this action, the Secretary of the Interior construed the pertinent acts of Congress as requiring that the administrator or executor of a deceased Osage Indian should be paid all trust funds subsequently accruing to the credit of the head-rights owned by such Indian at the time of his death. May 25,1915, the Solicitor of the Interior Department made a formal ruling that. trust funds…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Taylor v. TayrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Cowokochee v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruce v. Globe Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API