Legal Opinion

Maupai v. Jackson

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action upon a contract.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action is to recover the deposit paid on entering into a contract for the purchase of certain property known as Eos. 208 and 210- West Seventeenth street, borough of Manhattan, Eew York city, and for the expenses *409incurred by the plaintiff in connection with the examination of the title to the premises in suit. The contract was subsequently modified as hereinafter stated. The complaint alleges, among other things, that on the 11th day of March, 1908, the date to which the closing of the title was adjourned, the plaintiff was ready, willing and able to perform the contract as modified, but…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . EagletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Ziehen v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Moser v. . CochraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Crawford v. . KrollpfeifferNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Education Society v. HuntingtonOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API