Voshell v. Cavender
Superior Court of Delaware
Rude to show cause why sheriff’s return to an execution should not be quashed and stricken from the record. A petition was filed by the defendant alleging: ‘1 That on the twenty-first day of May, the plaintiffs in the above entitled judgment caused a writ of Fieri Facias to be issued out of the Superior Court to William R. Flinn,Sheriff of said County, to seize and take in execution the personal property, goods and chattels of the said defendant, said writ being No. 10 to…
Read the full summary
Rude to show cause why sheriff’s return to an execution should not be quashed and stricken from the record. A petition was filed by the defendant alleging: ‘1 That on the twenty-first day of May, the plaintiffs in the above entitled judgment caused a writ of Fieri Facias to be issued out of the Superior Court to William R. Flinn,Sheriff of said County, to seize and take in execution the personal property, goods and chattels of the said defendant, said writ being No. 10 to the September term, 1897, iu which said writ the Sheriff made the following return: Nulla bona and afterwards levied on…
1Opinion of the Court
Spruancr, J:—
This is a rule to show cause why the sheriff’s return to Fi. Fa. No. io to the September term, 1897, should not be quashed and stricken from the record. The return is, Nulla bona and afterwards levied on lands and tenements as per description annexed. The inquisition was held on the 19th of October following, under a rule issued after the return of the Fi. Fa.
The sworn petition of the defendant sets forth the grounds of his application, and we can consider no others.
The first question discussed in the argument was, whether this Court, under any circumstances, at any time, had a…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Comegys v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1949