Legal Opinion

Van Cortlandt v. New York Central Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The plaintiffs have sought by this action to obtain a judgment declaring the rigid and immovable railroad bridge of the defendant over the Croton river to be an unlawful obstruction and a public nuisance, and further directing its removal. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the Croton river was non-navigable and that, moreover, the plaintiffs were guilty of loches in failing to make any move or objection for a period of over forty years. The Appellate Division reversed many of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, made new findings, but failed to afford the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adirondack League Club, Inc. v. Sierra ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Fairchild v. KraemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Friends of Thayer Lake LLC v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Marine Air Ways, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
  5. United States v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API