Legal Opinion

Neill v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1927No. 17739Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Counsel for the State, in his brief, moves to dismiss the bill of exceptions in this case “for the reason that the city court of Eairburn is not a constitutional court from which a bill of exceptions will be entertained by the appellate courts. The city court of Eairburn was created in July, 1923, at which time the city of Eairburn was incorporated as a ‘ Town of Eairburn/ ” The record contains no motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions. However, if this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the bill of exceptions, this court would, of its own motion, dismiss the writ of error. *293“It is not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Welborne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API