In re Green
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
[In bankruptcy. In the matter of John Green.)
1Opinion of the Court
HOPKINS, District Judge.
Bichard Green proved a claim of $7,715.16 against the bankrupt’s estate, and James Norris of $1,877.23. The assignee moves to expunge Norris’ claim and to reduce Green’s. The grounds upon which the motion is made are, that the contracts upon which the claims are based were void, first, by the statute of frauds, and second, that they were gaming contracts. In the view I have taken of the case, it is only necessary to consider the latter. There has been considerable testimony taken, and it is in some respects quite contradictory, but I think the conflict is more apparent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ruckman v. . PitcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Ruckman v. BryanNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Cassard v. HinmanThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Hooker v. KnabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barnard v. BackhausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Whitesides v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Beveridge v. HewittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881
- Mohr v. MiesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.