Legal Opinion
Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Ins. Co. Penn.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 18, 2012No. Case No. 2:12-CV-04947 SVW-AJWxPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS ORDER re: Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [18]
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 6, 2012, Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity. Company (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against Defendant Insurance Company of Pennsylvania (“Defendant”), seeking a declaration that Defendant has a duty to defend the parties’ common insured, the City of Santa Clarita (“City”). (Dkt.l). On August 30, 2012, the Court granted Defendant’s. Motion to Dismiss with 'leave to amend, holding that Plaintiff had failed to allege that the City exhausted the retained limits as set forth in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Trigueros v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.