Legal Opinion

Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Omni-Vest, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 1977No. DD-105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is being reconsidered upon ap-pellee’s motion for rehearing as to this court’s order striking appellee’s cross-assignments of error. The sole issue is whether a claimant may enter a remittitur, and then, upon appeal by the defendant in whose favor the remittitur was ordered, cross-assign as error the order directing a new trial unless the remittitur be entered.

Appellee, Omni-Vest, initially brought suit against appellant Reichhold for breach of contract. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the claimant in the amount of $75,000. Thereafter, the trial court entered an order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. RucklesSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Ed C. Wright & Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. Dargis v. MaguireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Climatrol Corp. v. KentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Omni-Vest, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API