Legal Opinion

Anstey v. Wilson

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided June 26, 1962No. 61-7353Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honeyman, J.,. . . The restrictive covenant herein involved has a time period of 20 years and covers an area of the entire United States, except Florida. The covenant was made by defendant, vendor of a small retail glass and glazing business doing business wholly within a 15 mile radius of the Borough of Pottstown. Since the basic purpose of a restrictive covenant not to compete is to protect the sale of the business, the extent and duration of the covenant must *696be reasonably related to the need for this protection. Plaintiff recognizes that both the time and the area in this covenant, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. JutteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Fisher v. HagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API