Legal Opinion

Puetz v. Carlson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1961No. 10104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

Plaintiffs as co-partners brought this action against defendants to recover for work and labor alleged to have been performed and for materials alleged to have been furnished and delivered to defendants. Verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied and they have appealed from the judgment and have attempted to appeal from the order denying a new trial though appeals from such orders have been abolished. Section 93-8017.

The complaint alleges that defendants became indebted to plaintiffs for such labor and materials which were alleged to have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Shepard v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Smith v. GunnissMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Blankenship v. DeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keneally v. OrgainMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Clark v. Rex Worrall & Canyon Hotels, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Falls Sand and Gravel Co. v. Western Concrete, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1967
  4. Bennett Leasing Company v. EllisonUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Baldwin v. StuberMontana Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API