Harmon v. State

ZEHMER, Judge.

Once again we review the convictions and sentences of Ira J. Harmon. The pertinent facts and relevant history of this case *1028are stated in those opinions.1 Harmon raises three points on this appeal, only two of which require discussion.

First, he contends that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines because the single reason given,2 although it had been previously approved on prior appeals to this court, was invalid under the supreme court’s decision in State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988), which was rendered after those appeals but prior to his most…