Legal Opinion

Ward Farms Partnership v. Enerbase Cooperative Resources

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2015No. 20140104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ward Farms Partnership and others (“Ward Farms”) appeal from a district court judgment denying its motion to amend its complaint and granting a summary judgment motion in favor of Ener-base Cooperative Resources (“Enerbase”). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ward Farms’ motion to amend, and the district court did not err in granting Enerbase’s summary judgment motion because Ward Farms did not raise an issue of material fact regarding its claim. We affirm the district court judgment.

I

[¶ 2] This case stems from Ward Farms’ purchase…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zuger v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Heart River Partners v. GoetzfriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fetch v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Thimjon Farms Partnership v. First International Bank & TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Rutherford v. BNSF Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API