Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Torbert v. Licciardi

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1996No. 94-CA-2026Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

| iWALTZER, Judge

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in that part of the majority opinion that finds that Dr. Licciardi breached the applicable standard of care in his treatment of Amanda Torbert. In addition to the evidence mentioned in the majority opinion, Dr. Reyes’s testimony and Dr. Haddad’s treatment offer persuasive support for the trial court’s liability finding. Dr. Reyes testified that under the circumstances of Amanda’s injury he would take an x-ray after the plaster was applied, which Dr. Licciardi failed to do. Dr. Reyes testified that for the next three weeks he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Gaspard v. LeMaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  4. Bartholomew v. CNG Producing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Moore v. Healthcare Elmwood, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API