Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Petroff

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1999No. 98-2641PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Bart (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 538, 687 N.E.2d 681, and Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 280, 690 N.E.2d 1271, were cases involving facts similar to these. In those cases we imposed a one-year suspension with full credit for time served under the interim suspension. We adopt the board’s recommendation that we impose the same sanction in this case. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year with full credit for time served. Cost are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. SeallOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. BartOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. MargolisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. ToohigOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. PetroffOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'MalleyOhio Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API