Murray v. Associated Insurers, Incorporated

Plaintiffs ask the Commission to rehear this case, arguing that the hearing Deputy and Full Commission panel previously did not take into account certain evidence the Court of Appeals cited in its decision to remand the case.

Plaintiff argues that "a cursory review of the Supreme Court's short opinion establishes" that its "action was based on grounds other than the [Court Appeals'] evidentiary ruling" and that "that ruling remains intact, and is the law of the case". Findings in the Commission's decisions suggest that this evidence was weighed, and the Supreme Court quotes the provisional…